Idaho Federal Spending — Week of 2026-06-28
Federal Spending Report: Idaho (June 28 – July 4, 2026)
The Department of Agriculture obligated $92,000 across seven grant awards in Idaho during the week of June 28 to July 4, 2026, concentrating all federal spending activity through a single contractor in the state.
The spending period saw relatively modest federal commitments, with the largest individual awards clustered in the $13,000 to $14,000 range. The top award reached $14,000, followed by two additional $14,000 grants and two $13,000 awards, representing the five largest allocations from Agriculture Department coffers. All seven awards were structured as grants rather than contracts or other obligation types, suggesting support for agricultural programs, research, or community initiatives across Idaho.
Distribution across the top five awards shows minimal variance, with the largest grant exceeding the smallest by just $1,000. This relatively even allocation pattern suggests systematic disbursement, possibly from a single agricultural grant program operating on standardized award amounts. The remaining two awards, while not individually detailed in the top five, collectively accounted for the remainder of the $92,000 total obligation.
The Department of Agriculture dominated federal spending activity in Idaho during this period, accounting for all $92,000 obligated through its seven individual grants. No other federal agencies issued awards to Idaho recipients during the week, making Agriculture the sole source of federal spending tracked in the state.
Notably, all spending flowed through a single contractor or recipient entity, concentrating federal resources in one organization. This concentration—seven awards totaling $92,000 to one recipient—may indicate a major agricultural enterprise, nonprofit organization, or government entity serving as the primary federal partner in Idaho for this particular program.
The week's activity represents a narrow spending snapshot focused exclusively on agricultural grants with uniform award structures. The pattern suggests routine, program-based disbursements rather than emergency or supplemental funding, consistent with standard grant administration cycles.